TY - JOUR
T1 - Amlodipine and frusemide
T2 - pharmacological factors contributing to increased fall risk in concurrently treated patients – a retrospective cross-sectional study
AU - Alqurain, Aymen
AU - Albaharnah, Murtada
AU - Al Zayer, Samanah
AU - Alanzi, Maha
AU - Alblushi, Razan
AU - Aleid, Rawan
AU - Ashoor, Rand
AU - Albahrani, Ali
AU - Almahdi, Mustafa
AU - Al-Shaibi, Samaher
AU - Ameer, Luma
AU - Ghosn, Sherihan
AU - Algoraini, Marwa
AU - Alsubaie, Nawal
AU - Alshnbari, Afnan
AU - Alomar, Fadhel A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Alqurain, Albaharnah, Al Zayer, Alanzi, Alblushi, Aleid, Ashoor, Albahrani, Almahdi, Al-Shaibi, Ameer, Ghosn, Algoraini, Alsubaie, Alshnbari and Alomar.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Calcium channel blockers, such as amlodipine, are commonly prescribed for hypertension but can cause peripheral edema, often requiring adjunctive frusemide. Concerns exist regarding the potential increase in fall risk, particularly in older populations. However, few studies have assessed the prevalence of amlodipine and frusemide combination (AFC) prescriptions and their association with fall risk factors. Objectives: The aims of this study are to determine the prevalence of AFC prescriptions and evaluate their association with fall risk factors in an outpatient cardiology clinic population. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥40 years from Al-Qatif Central Hospital’s outpatient cardiology clinic (January 2021 -December 2022) prescribed amlodipine. Fall risk factors were identified from literature. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to estimate 1-year mortality risk. The number of prescribed orthostatic hypotension-inducing drugs (OHDs) and fall-risk increasing drugs (FRIDs) was recorded. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the association between AFC prescriptions and fall risk factors, adjusting for significant covariates. Results are expressed as adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Of 3,681 patients, 18%. Were prescribed AFC. AFC patients were older (70 vs. 64 years, P < 0.001), had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (64% vs. 44%, P < 0.001), anemia (55% vs. 32%, P < 0.001), and osteoporosis (51% vs. 28%, P < 0.001), and received more OHDs prescriptions (2.8 vs. 1.3, P < 0.001) compared to non-AFC patients. Higher CCI scores (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.41–1.62) and more OHDs prescriptions (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 2.3–2.7) were significantly associated with AFC prescriptions. Conclusion: AFC prescriptions are prevalent, and patients prescribed AFC have higher prevalence of fall risk factors. Comprehensive patients assessment is essential to minimize fall risk and related complications.
AB - Background: Calcium channel blockers, such as amlodipine, are commonly prescribed for hypertension but can cause peripheral edema, often requiring adjunctive frusemide. Concerns exist regarding the potential increase in fall risk, particularly in older populations. However, few studies have assessed the prevalence of amlodipine and frusemide combination (AFC) prescriptions and their association with fall risk factors. Objectives: The aims of this study are to determine the prevalence of AFC prescriptions and evaluate their association with fall risk factors in an outpatient cardiology clinic population. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥40 years from Al-Qatif Central Hospital’s outpatient cardiology clinic (January 2021 -December 2022) prescribed amlodipine. Fall risk factors were identified from literature. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to estimate 1-year mortality risk. The number of prescribed orthostatic hypotension-inducing drugs (OHDs) and fall-risk increasing drugs (FRIDs) was recorded. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the association between AFC prescriptions and fall risk factors, adjusting for significant covariates. Results are expressed as adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Of 3,681 patients, 18%. Were prescribed AFC. AFC patients were older (70 vs. 64 years, P < 0.001), had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (64% vs. 44%, P < 0.001), anemia (55% vs. 32%, P < 0.001), and osteoporosis (51% vs. 28%, P < 0.001), and received more OHDs prescriptions (2.8 vs. 1.3, P < 0.001) compared to non-AFC patients. Higher CCI scores (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.41–1.62) and more OHDs prescriptions (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 2.3–2.7) were significantly associated with AFC prescriptions. Conclusion: AFC prescriptions are prevalent, and patients prescribed AFC have higher prevalence of fall risk factors. Comprehensive patients assessment is essential to minimize fall risk and related complications.
KW - amlodipine
KW - fall risk
KW - frusemide
KW - orthostatic hypotension
KW - prescribing cascade
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012975026
U2 - 10.3389/fphar.2025.1598161
DO - 10.3389/fphar.2025.1598161
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105012975026
VL - 16
JO - Frontiers in Pharmacology
JF - Frontiers in Pharmacology
M1 - 1598161
ER -
