TY - GEN
T1 - Biometric Authentification Comparison
T2 - 2023 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, CSCI 2023
AU - Mallouli, Fatma
AU - Khelifi, Nesrine
AU - Hellal, Aya
AU - Ferjani, Imen
AU - Chaabane, Nada
AU - Dakhlaoui, Mejda
AU - Chamakhi, Houda
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 IEEE.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Since the pandemic's announcement, covid-19 has hit almost all businesses. Regular office jobs and commercial meetings are changed and adopt the fully online new technology tools. To avoid coworkers' interaction with each other in all departments and face-to-face contact in person, all sectors of industry and all vital domains adopt the fully digital approach. The extreme need for new technology based on information systems leads users to adopt secure tools to face the pandemic. to protect the integrity and confidentiality of data. Biometric Technologies are rapidly becoming the ideal solution to solve lots of problems including human identification. Biometrics are declared to offer the security and accuracy of human being identification and authentication. However, each biometric check involves a series of processes that are interspersed with choices and contingencies on several levels. Additionally, there are underlying normative presumptions about human anatomy that have extremely severe effects on how biometric systems work. Several Recent research analyses have clarified gendered and racist prejudices as the cause of biometric system failures. The production, usage, and problematization of bodily differences during the research and design stages of biometric systems, as well as during their use, are highlighted by a more nuanced understanding of how biometrics and bodily differences intersect. Yet, every biometric check consists of a process with many intermediate steps, introducing contingency and choice on many levels. In addition, there are underlying normative assumptions regarding human bodies that affect the functioning of biometric systems in highly problematic ways. In recent social science studies, the failures of biometric systems have been interpreted as gendered and racialized biases. A more nuanced understanding of how biometrics and bodily differences intersect draws attention to how bodily differences are produced, used, and problematized during the research and design phases of biometric systems, as well as in their use. However, a biometric system such as the iris, ear, retina, voice, and fingerprint uses human body characteristics. This work demonstrates how biometrics works and compares different techniques to understand the most secure and accurate biometric system.
AB - Since the pandemic's announcement, covid-19 has hit almost all businesses. Regular office jobs and commercial meetings are changed and adopt the fully online new technology tools. To avoid coworkers' interaction with each other in all departments and face-to-face contact in person, all sectors of industry and all vital domains adopt the fully digital approach. The extreme need for new technology based on information systems leads users to adopt secure tools to face the pandemic. to protect the integrity and confidentiality of data. Biometric Technologies are rapidly becoming the ideal solution to solve lots of problems including human identification. Biometrics are declared to offer the security and accuracy of human being identification and authentication. However, each biometric check involves a series of processes that are interspersed with choices and contingencies on several levels. Additionally, there are underlying normative presumptions about human anatomy that have extremely severe effects on how biometric systems work. Several Recent research analyses have clarified gendered and racist prejudices as the cause of biometric system failures. The production, usage, and problematization of bodily differences during the research and design stages of biometric systems, as well as during their use, are highlighted by a more nuanced understanding of how biometrics and bodily differences intersect. Yet, every biometric check consists of a process with many intermediate steps, introducing contingency and choice on many levels. In addition, there are underlying normative assumptions regarding human bodies that affect the functioning of biometric systems in highly problematic ways. In recent social science studies, the failures of biometric systems have been interpreted as gendered and racialized biases. A more nuanced understanding of how biometrics and bodily differences intersect draws attention to how bodily differences are produced, used, and problematized during the research and design phases of biometric systems, as well as in their use. However, a biometric system such as the iris, ear, retina, voice, and fingerprint uses human body characteristics. This work demonstrates how biometrics works and compares different techniques to understand the most secure and accurate biometric system.
KW - Biometric technology
KW - Hand Geometry
KW - iris
KW - retina;voice;fingerprint
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85199996514
U2 - 10.1109/CSCI62032.2023.00206
DO - 10.1109/CSCI62032.2023.00206
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85199996514
T3 - Proceedings - 2023 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, CSCI 2023
SP - 1264
EP - 1270
BT - Proceedings - 2023 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, CSCI 2023
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 13 December 2023 through 15 December 2023
ER -