Direct Comparison of Four Hematopoietic Differentiation Methods from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

  • Melinda L. Tursky
  • , To Ha Loi
  • , Crisbel M. Artuz
  • , Suad Alateeq
  • , Ernst J. Wolvetang
  • , Helen Tao
  • , David D. Ma*
  • , Timothy J. Molloy*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Tursky and colleagues addressed a vital, unmet need to aid method selection for iPSC hematopoietic differentiation for research and potentially clinical use, comparing four representative serum- and feeder-layer-free methods. Assessments include production efficiency of CD34+ and functional hematopoietic progenitor cells, cost-benefit analysis, and ability to recapitulate aberrant hematopoiesis. An optimized method proved the most efficient, cost-effective, and sensitive.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)735-748
Number of pages14
JournalStem Cell Reports
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 8 Sep 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Down syndrome
  • cell differentiation
  • disease modeling
  • erythroid progenitor cells
  • hematopoiesis
  • hematopoietic progenitor cells
  • hematopoietic stem cells
  • induced pluripotent stem cells
  • pluripotent stem cells
  • β-thalassemia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct Comparison of Four Hematopoietic Differentiation Methods from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this