Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Investigating patients’ perceptions of ChatGPT as a health information resource: A qualitative study

  • Miznah Hizam AlShammary
  • , Norah Mohammed Alyahya
  • , Eman M. Alanazi
  • , Abdullah Aldaeej
  • , Aljouharah Mohammed Alanazi
  • , Walaa Hassan
  • , Tamer Farag
  • , Sager Mohammed Alanazi
  • , Hamad Mohammed Al Otaibi
  • , Salem Albagmi
  • , Wejdan M. Arif
  • , Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain
  • , Afnan Fahd Almuhanna
  • , Fahad Alanezi*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • King Saud University
  • Saudi Electronic University
  • Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Medical Group
  • Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
  • Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences - Al Dhahran
  • Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence-powered tools like ChatGPT has introduced new avenues for patients to access health information independently. Understanding how patients perceive and engage with such tools is essential to evaluating their trustworthiness, usability, and potential impact on health decision-making. Aim: The purpose of this study is to investigate the facilitators and barriers of using ChatGPT as a health information resource for patients’ health management. Methods: A qualitative research design was adopted in this study. The participants included outpatients at a public hospital. Participants interacted with ChatGPT (version 3.5) for at least 15 min daily over 2 weeks to explore health-related topics before participating in semi-structured interviews. A total of 28 outpatients participated in the interviews. Results: The findings from this study have indicated both positive and negative aspects of ChatGPT as a health information resource. Among the 28 participants, the most frequently reported facilitators included improved health literacy (reported by 26 participants, 92.9%), effectiveness and efficiency (24 participants, 85.7%), cost-effectiveness (23 participants, 82.1%), accessibility (17 participants, 60.7%), empowerment (13 participants, 46.4%), and anonymity (11 participants, 39.3%). Reported barriers included lack of personalized information (15 participants, 53.6%), limited reliability (9 participants, 32.1%), restricted diagnostic capability (6 participants, 21.4%), lack of human interaction (14 participants, 50%), privacy concerns (4 participants, 14.3%), legal and ethical issues (9 participants, 32.1%), and lack of emotional support (3 participants, 10.7%). Conclusion: Although ChatGPT has significant benefits of being used as a health information resource, to arrive at specific conclusions, there is a need to extend these kinds of studies across the regions to assess the impact of ChatGPT on different populations for promoting health literacy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number02601060251376091
JournalNutrition and Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • awareness
  • ChatGPT
  • health information
  • health literacy
  • public

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating patients’ perceptions of ChatGPT as a health information resource: A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this