TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effectiveness of closed kinetic chain exercises in individuals with knee osteoarthritis
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Fadil, Ammar
AU - Muaidi, Qassim Ibrahim
AU - Alayat, Mohamed Salaheldien
AU - AlMatrafi, Nahla Ahmad
AU - Subahi, Moayad Saleh
AU - Alshehri, Mansour Abdullah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Fadil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Introduction The aims of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of closed kinetic chain exercise (CKCE) on pain, function, and proprioception in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods Nine databases were searched up to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of CKCE in individuals with knee OA were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the level of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE system. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess differences between treatment groups for the primary outcomes (pain and function). Effect sizes were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 24 studies were included in the descriptive analysis, and 18 studies were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). The meta-analysis results indicated that CKCE treatment led to greater improvements in pain (SMD=−0.76; 95% CI: −1.51, −0.01) and function (SMD=−1.25; 95% CI: −1.88, −0.62) compared to no treatment. A subgroup meta-analysis showed that the combined treatment of CKCE and conventional physical therapy (CPT) resulted in greater improvements in pain (SMD=−1.18; 95% CI: −1.70, −0.67) and function (SMD=−1.27; 95% CI: −1.79, −0.75) compared to CPT alone. The risk of bias assessment revealed that two studies were of low quality, nine were of fair quality, and the remaining 13 were of high quality. The GRADE system indicated a low quality of evidence for the effects of CKCE on both pain and function. Conclusion While CKCE shows promise in reducing pain and improving function in individuals with knee OA, the quality of evidence is considered low according to the GRADE system. Further high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the effectiveness of CKCE in managing knee OA.
AB - Introduction The aims of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of closed kinetic chain exercise (CKCE) on pain, function, and proprioception in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods Nine databases were searched up to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of CKCE in individuals with knee OA were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the level of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE system. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess differences between treatment groups for the primary outcomes (pain and function). Effect sizes were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 24 studies were included in the descriptive analysis, and 18 studies were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). The meta-analysis results indicated that CKCE treatment led to greater improvements in pain (SMD=−0.76; 95% CI: −1.51, −0.01) and function (SMD=−1.25; 95% CI: −1.88, −0.62) compared to no treatment. A subgroup meta-analysis showed that the combined treatment of CKCE and conventional physical therapy (CPT) resulted in greater improvements in pain (SMD=−1.18; 95% CI: −1.70, −0.67) and function (SMD=−1.27; 95% CI: −1.79, −0.75) compared to CPT alone. The risk of bias assessment revealed that two studies were of low quality, nine were of fair quality, and the remaining 13 were of high quality. The GRADE system indicated a low quality of evidence for the effects of CKCE on both pain and function. Conclusion While CKCE shows promise in reducing pain and improving function in individuals with knee OA, the quality of evidence is considered low according to the GRADE system. Further high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the effectiveness of CKCE in managing knee OA.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004603704
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0322475
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0322475
M3 - Article
C2 - 40315212
AN - SCOPUS:105004603704
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 5 May
M1 - e0322475
ER -