Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Antimicrobial utilization among hospitalized patients according to WHO AWaRe classification: Results from a multicentre point prevalence survey in Saudi Arabia

  • Nada A. Alsaleh*
  • , Abeer AlSmari
  • , Abrar F. Alhameed
  • , Ahmed O. Alenazi
  • , Alaa A. Alsharif
  • , Amal Bin Akresh
  • , Anwar M. Alnakhli
  • , Bashaier Alshehail
  • , Eman A. Alzahrani
  • , Ghadah H. Alshehri
  • , Ghazwa B. Korayem
  • , Hanan A. Bakri
  • , Khalid Eljaaly
  • , Lina I. Alnajjar
  • , Norah S. Aldeghaither
  • , Reem Almahasna
  • , Sara Almuhisen
  • , Yassmin Alsomali
  • , Zikria Saleem
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
  • Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs
  • King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
  • Prince Sultan Military Medical City
  • King Fahd Central Hospital
  • King Abdulaziz University
  • King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam
  • King Fahad Medical City
  • Qassim University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens global health by reducing the efficacy of common infection treatments. This study examines antimicrobial use in Saudi Arabian hospitals, identifies influencing factors, and proposes interventions using the World Health Organization's (WHO) Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification system. Methods: A cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence survey (PPS) of antimicrobial utilization was conducted in 10 hospitals across 6 regions of Saudi Arabia September 2023. All inpatients receiving antimicrobials on the PPS day were included. Data collection utilized the Global PPS tool developed by the University of Antwerp, Belgium. Results: Among 2890 inpatients, 766 (26.5%) were prescribed at least one antimicrobial, resulting in a total of 982 prescriptions. The primary indications for these antimicrobials were community-acquired infections (37.1%), Healthcare-associated infections (35.9%), surgical prophylaxis (15.4%), unknown reasons (8.7%), medical prophylaxis (2.5%), and other reasons (0.3%). The most common reasons for antimicrobial use included pneumonia or lower respiratory tract infections (16.1%), skin and soft tissue infections (11%) and bacteraemia (8.9%). The most frequently prescribed antimicrobial classes were penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors (18.5%), carbapenems (15.7%), and third-generation cephalosporins (11.1%). Most of the antimicrobials (66.3%) were classified as Watch antimicrobials, followed by 23.8% as Access, and 8.9% as Reserve. Conclusions: The study provides valuable insights into antimicrobial utilization in Saudi Arabia, offering a baseline for assessing prescribing patterns. While findings may reflect certain antimicrobial stewardship efforts, further investigation is needed to evaluate their impact. The study also highlights key areas for improvement, emphasizing the importance of conducting future PPS to guide antimicrobial stewardship strategies and monitor progress in managing AMR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-156
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Volume45
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial utilization
  • Point prevalence survey
  • Quality indicator
  • Saudi Arabia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antimicrobial utilization among hospitalized patients according to WHO AWaRe classification: Results from a multicentre point prevalence survey in Saudi Arabia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this