Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Determinants of post-operative left ventricular dysfunction in degenerative mitral regurgitation

  • Aeshah M. Althunayyan
  • , Sahar Alborikan
  • , Sveeta Badiani
  • , Kit Wong
  • , Rakesh Uppal
  • , Nikhil Patel
  • , Steffen E. Petersen
  • , Guy Lloyd
  • , Sanjeev Bhattacharyya*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Barts Health NHS Trust
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
  • Health Data Research UK
  • Alan Turing Institute
  • University College London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: Chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation leads to volume overload causing left ventricular (LV) enlargement and eventually LV impairment. Current guidelines determining thresholds for intervention are based on LV diameters and ejection fraction (LVEF). There are sparse data examining the value of LV volumes and newer markers of LV performance on outcomes of surgery in mitral valve prolapse. The aim of this study is to identify the best marker of LV impairment after mitral valve surgery. Methods and results: Prospective, observational study of patients with mitral valve prolapse undergoing mitral valve surgery. Pre-operative LV diameters, volumes, LVEF, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and myocardial work measured. Post-operative LV impairment defined as LVEF < 50% at 1 year post-surgery. Eighty-seven patients included. Thirteen percent developed post-operative LV impairment. Patients with post-operative LV dysfunction showed significantly larger indexed LV end-systolic diameters, indexed LV end-systolic volumes (LVESVi), lower LVEF, and more abnormal GLS than patients without post-operative LV dysfunction. In multivariate analysis, LVESVi [odds ratio 1.11 (95% CI 1.01-1.23), P = 0.039] and GLS [odds ratio 1.46 (95% CI 1.00-2.14), P = 0.054] were the only independent predictors of post-operative LV dysfunction. The optimal cut-off of 36.3 mL/m2 for LVESVi had a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 78% for detection of post-operative LV impairment. Conclusion: Post-operative LV impairment is common. Indexed LV volumes (36.3 mL/m2) provided the best marker of post-operative LV impairment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1252-1257
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2023

Keywords

  • global longitudinal strain
  • LV volumes
  • mitral regurgitation
  • mitral valve prolapse
  • surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of post-operative left ventricular dysfunction in degenerative mitral regurgitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this