TY - JOUR
T1 - Vibrotactile positional therapy for the treatment of positional obstructive sleep apnoea
T2 - a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
AU - on behalf of the POSA trial investigators
AU - Kelly, Julia L.
AU - Turnbull, Chris D.
AU - Newson, Roger
AU - Dobson, Melissa
AU - Hedley, Emma L.
AU - Alqarni, Abdullah S.
AU - Nevinson, Ann
AU - Dawson, David
AU - Nickol, Annabel
AU - West, Sophie
AU - Talbot, Nick P.
AU - Rahman, Najib M.
AU - Stradling, John
AU - Morrell, Mary J.
AU - Simonds, Anita
AU - Polkey, Michael
AU - Hind, Matthew
AU - Hare, Alana
AU - Kelly, Julia
AU - AlQarni, Abdullah
AU - West, Sophie
AU - Hughes, Joan
AU - Nelson, Abigail
AU - Scott, Michael
AU - Nickol, Annabel
AU - Turnbull, Chris
AU - Patel, Bhumika
AU - Harris, Tara
AU - Trigg, Jessica
AU - Craig, Sonya
AU - Earley, Joanne
AU - Johnston, Brogan
AU - Withana, Shirmila
AU - Mandal, Swapna
AU - Saigal, Anita
AU - Shah, Amar
AU - Rahman, Najib
AU - Dobson, Melissa
AU - Hedley, Emma
AU - Lau, Mei
AU - Kitchen, George
AU - Daskalopoulou, Zoe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2026/4
Y1 - 2026/4
N2 - Background: New generation positional therapy devices provide vibrotactile feedback to patients with positional obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA), reducing supine sleep time and sleep apnoea severity. Longer-term effects on POSA severity, sleepiness and quality of life (QoL) are unclear. Methods: A randomised, parallel, double-blinded trial compared neck-worn positional therapy with sham-positional therapy over 3 months (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04153240).Adult patients with POSA (apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) >5 events/hour, 2:1 when supine vs non-supine) were randomised (1:1).The primary endpoint was AHI at 3 months, positional versus sham. Secondary analyses: interaction between the treatment effect and age; QoL, including Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: Between October 2019 and August 2022, 120 patients with median baseline AHI of 12.8 events/hour (IQR 9.2–18.5) were randomised; 59 to positional therapy and 61 to sham; 92 (77%) completed the trial. Positional therapy significantly reduced the AHI by −4.41 events/hour (95% CI −7.77 to –1.06; p=0.011) compared with sham, a 34% improvement. There was a significant improvement in PSQI: −1.0 (95% CI −2.1 to 0.0; p=0.04), but not ESS: −0.6 (95% CI −1.8 to 0.6; p=0.3), with positional therapy compared with sham (baseline ESS 8.8). Similar results were seen in younger (18–64) and older (≥65) age groups. Patients’ bed partners reported improvements in snoring and sleep quality for the patient and themselves. Over half of participants using the active device opted to continue. Conclusion: Neck-worn positional therapy reduced the severity of OSA and improved sleep quality but not sleepiness, over 3 months. Bed partner’s reported improvements in snoring and sleep quality. Trial registration number: NCT04153240.
AB - Background: New generation positional therapy devices provide vibrotactile feedback to patients with positional obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA), reducing supine sleep time and sleep apnoea severity. Longer-term effects on POSA severity, sleepiness and quality of life (QoL) are unclear. Methods: A randomised, parallel, double-blinded trial compared neck-worn positional therapy with sham-positional therapy over 3 months (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04153240).Adult patients with POSA (apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) >5 events/hour, 2:1 when supine vs non-supine) were randomised (1:1).The primary endpoint was AHI at 3 months, positional versus sham. Secondary analyses: interaction between the treatment effect and age; QoL, including Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: Between October 2019 and August 2022, 120 patients with median baseline AHI of 12.8 events/hour (IQR 9.2–18.5) were randomised; 59 to positional therapy and 61 to sham; 92 (77%) completed the trial. Positional therapy significantly reduced the AHI by −4.41 events/hour (95% CI −7.77 to –1.06; p=0.011) compared with sham, a 34% improvement. There was a significant improvement in PSQI: −1.0 (95% CI −2.1 to 0.0; p=0.04), but not ESS: −0.6 (95% CI −1.8 to 0.6; p=0.3), with positional therapy compared with sham (baseline ESS 8.8). Similar results were seen in younger (18–64) and older (≥65) age groups. Patients’ bed partners reported improvements in snoring and sleep quality for the patient and themselves. Over half of participants using the active device opted to continue. Conclusion: Neck-worn positional therapy reduced the severity of OSA and improved sleep quality but not sleepiness, over 3 months. Bed partner’s reported improvements in snoring and sleep quality. Trial registration number: NCT04153240.
KW - Sleep
KW - Sleep apnoea
KW - Symptom Assessment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019251766
U2 - 10.1136/thorax-2024-222681
DO - 10.1136/thorax-2024-222681
M3 - Article
C2 - 40992934
AN - SCOPUS:105019251766
SN - 0040-6376
VL - 81
SP - 370
EP - 379
JO - Thorax
JF - Thorax
IS - 4
ER -